Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaul Mitchellvi
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T07:46:42Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-15T07:46:42Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Language, Literature and Culture. - 2022. - Vol 69. - No 2-3. - p.49-61vi
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/139465-
dc.descriptionTạp chí mua quyền truy cập TAYLOR & FRANCISvi
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I discuss two recent films, Frankenstein (Kevin Connor 2004) and Victor Frankenstein (Paul McGuigan 2015), in terms of how they represent disability for mainstream television and cinema spectators. Using a critical framework that blends disability and adaptation studies, I analyse both films from a ‘crip’ perspective – that is, by interpreting how they propagate or resist the able-bodied assumptions upon which many Frankenstein narratives are based. As screen readaptations, I explore how Connor’s Frankenstein and Victor Frankenstein reflexively engage with this historical legacy, whilst providing textually ‘deformed’ versions of the story for contemporary audiences.vi
dc.format.extent14 p.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisvi
dc.subjectFrankensteinvi
dc.subjectFilmvi
dc.titleMary Shelley’s ‘hideous progeny:’ readaptation and (textual) deformity in two recent Frankenstein filmsvi
dc.typeArticlevi
Appears in CollectionsBài trích

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
  • MaryShelley_PaulMitchell.pdf
      Restricted Access
    • Size : 1,27 MB

    • Format : Adobe PDF