Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Nilli Diengott | vi |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-26T03:42:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-26T03:42:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1997 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association. - 1997. - Volume 88. - No. 1. - p.37-49 | vi |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/139577 | - |
| dc.description | Tạp chí mua quyền truy cập TAYLOR & FRANCIS | vi |
| dc.description.abstract | While working on a book discussing critical approaches and using Jane Austen as a test case for my discussion. I encountered a problem of wider implications for current critical and theoretical discourse. This essay will discuss the problem and its implications by concentrating on three critical texts: Marvin Mudrick's Jane Austen: Irony as Defense and Discovery (1952; Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1968), Marilyn Butler's Jane Austen and the War of Ideas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975) and Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar's The Madwoman in the Attic (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979). | vi |
| dc.format.extent | 13 p. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | vi |
| dc.subject | book discussing | vi |
| dc.title | Neo impressionism? Some examples of austen criticism and their import for current critical discourse | vi |
| dc.type | Article | vi |
| Appears in Collections | Bài trích | |
Files in This Item:
