Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMichael M. Loganvi
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-02T03:23:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-02T03:23:47Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association. - 2001. - Volume 96. - No. 1. - p.49-71vi
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/139719-
dc.descriptionTạp chí mua quyền truy cập TAYLOR & FRANCISvi
dc.description.abstractThe following essay appears in two sections, the first arguing that Hannah Arendt's work-understood in the context of Martin Heidegger's interrogation of western metaphysical traditions-follows Heidegger in describing the history of hwnanism and its supporting metaphysical philosophies as an accumulation of a world of appearances, a "world view," that only appears to be natural. "Nature" signifies a link between Arendt's and Heidegger's texts. Human ways of knowing have taken nature's gifts out of their "natural" surroundings, and habitual uses of the word "nature" have, historically, supported domination of nature on the part of humankind, in the name of research. Nature is humankind's way of representing to itself the whole world.1vi
dc.format.extent23 p.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisvi
dc.subjectnature–humanvi
dc.subjectsacredvi
dc.subjectstatelessvi
dc.titleHannah Arendt: nature–human, sacred, and statelessvi
dc.typeArticlevi
Appears in CollectionsBài trích

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
  • Hannaharendt_MichaelMLogan.pdf
      Restricted Access
    • Size : 1,62 MB

    • Format : Adobe PDF