Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | James R. O'Shea | vi |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-24T04:13:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-24T04:13:38Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1997 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Philosophical Studies. - 1997. - No.2, Vol. 5. - P. 216-54 | vi |
| dc.identifier.issn | 09672559 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/140164 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This article examines the relationship in Kant between transcendental laws and empirical laws (focusing on causal laws), and then brings a particular interpretation of that issue to bear on familiar puzzles concerning the status of the regulative maxims of reason and reflective judgment... | vi |
| dc.format.extent | 40 p. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | vi |
| dc.subject | Kant | vi |
| dc.subject | Understanding | vi |
| dc.subject | Reason | vi |
| dc.subject | Empirical laws | vi |
| dc.subject | Regulative maxims | vi |
| dc.subject | Causality | vi |
| dc.title | The needs of understanding: Kant on empirical laws and regulative ideals | vi |
| dc.type | Article | vi |
| Appears in Collections | Bài trích | |
Files in This Item:
