Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bin Zhao | vi |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-24T07:48:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-24T07:48:04Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Philosophical Studies. - 2022. - No.1, Vol. 30. - P. 56–71 | vi |
| dc.identifier.issn | (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riph20 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/140181 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | It has been argued that an advantage of the safety account over the sensitivity account is that the safety account preserves epistemic closure, while the sensitivity account implies epistemic closure failure... | vi |
| dc.format.extent | 17 p. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | vi |
| dc.subject | Competent deduction | vi |
| dc.subject | Epistemic closure | vi |
| dc.subject | Inferential beliefs | vi |
| dc.subject | Sensitivity | vi |
| dc.subject | The generality problem | vi |
| dc.subject | Knowledge | vi |
| dc.subject | Safety | vi |
| dc.subject | Belief-formation methods | vi |
| dc.title | Sensitivity, Safety, and Epistemic Closure | vi |
| dc.type | Article | vi |
| Appears in Collections | Bài trích | |
Files in This Item:
