Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Katherina Kinzel | vi |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-26T02:53:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-26T02:53:31Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Philosophical Studies. -2018. -No.1,Vol.26. -P.40-71 | vi |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/140229 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Relativism is often motivated in terms of certain types of disagreement. In this paper, we survey the philosophical debates over two such types: faultless disagreement in the case of gustatory conflict, and fundamental disagreement in the case of epistemic conflict... | vi |
| dc.format.extent | 33 p. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | vi |
| dc.subject | Relativism | vi |
| dc.subject | Disagreement | vi |
| dc.subject | Sociology of scientific knowledge | vi |
| dc.subject | Idealization | vi |
| dc.title | De-idealizing Disagreement, Rethinking Relativism | vi |
| dc.type | Article | vi |
| Appears in Collections | Bài trích | |
Files in This Item:
