Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSoojin Kimvi
dc.contributor.authorArunima Krishnavi
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-25T09:01:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-25T09:01:43Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Journal of Communication. - 2017. - Vol.27, No.5. - P.517 - 535vi
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/141203-
dc.description.abstractThis study seeks to understand the effectiveness of an organization’s communication strategy in enhancing its crisis management capability in public management. The relationships between two types of communication strategies (bridging and buffering), crisis management capability in public management, relational improvement, reputational improvement, and conflict avoidance have been tested to suggest how an organization’s overall strategic orientation may help its ability to weather a crisis. A survey of communication managers was conducted in South Korea with 105 responses, representing 105 organizations. Results revealed that organizations which are predisposed toward adopting the bridging strategy as their main communication strategy also report better crisis management capability in public management, and as a result, experience positive relational and reputational outcomes.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherLee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singaporevi
dc.subjectCommunication strategy; crisis management capability; public management; relational improvement; reputational improvementvi
dc.subjectConflict avoidancevi
dc.titleBridging strategy versus buffering strategy: enhancing crisis management capability in public management for relational and reputational improvement, and conflict avoidancevi
dc.typeArticlevi
Appears in CollectionsBài trích

Files in This Item: