Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavid Tanvi
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-05T02:59:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-05T02:59:50Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Journal of Communication. - 2014. - Vol.24, No.1. - P.101 - 104vi
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/141315-
dc.description.abstractInterdisciplinarity has become a transforming force in legal studies, and its advantages have been well canvassed. How might cultural studies be useful to law? One often equates cultural studies with the theory and politics of ideology, identity, and difference, and with the 3D’s of deconstruction, demythologization, and demystification (Rojek, 2007, pp. 27–28), but new discursive opportunities often present themselves when cultural studies moves ‘towards a model of articulation as “transformative practice”’ (Grossberg, 1996, p. 88).vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, National University of Singaporevi
dc.titleCreativity and its discontents: China's creative industries and intellectual property rights offensesvi
dc.typeArticlevi
Appears in CollectionsBài trích

Files in This Item: