Item Infomation
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wimal Dissanayake | vi |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-21T09:47:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-21T09:47:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Asian Journal of Communication. - 2009. - Vol.19, No.4. - P.453 - 468 | vi |
dc.identifier.uri | http://elib.hcmussh.edu.vn/handle/HCMUSSH/141830 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The past two or three decades have witnessed an intense interest in rediscovering Asian theories of communication and exploring their applicability to modern communication studies. I myself have been deeply involved in this project for the past thirty years. While this should be welcomed as a much-needed project, it is imperative that we realize that this effort is as important as it is complex and many-sided; there are several perilous pitfalls in the way such as those presented by romanticism, essentialism and ahistoricism. In this article, I discuss some of these issues, and the ways in which we can profitably engage Western formulations of communication, in relation to what I term Type A and Type B theories. | vi |
dc.language.iso | en | vi |
dc.publisher | Academy for Creative Media, University of Hawaii, USA | vi |
dc.subject | Eurocentrism | vi |
dc.subject | Orientalism | vi |
dc.subject | Postcolonial theory | vi |
dc.subject | Buddhism | vi |
dc.subject | Reductionism | vi |
dc.subject.ddc | 300 | vi |
dc.title | The production of Asian theories of communication: contexts and challenges | vi |
dc.type | Article | vi |
Appears in Collections | Bài trích |
Files in This Item: